10.12.07

Massacre of Innocents

Posted in Uncategorized at 11:23 am by Administrator

I’ve seen in the news lately that the US Congress is now recognizing the Turkish killing of Armenians during WWI as being genocide. Of course, I have done no real research into the matter, and so really have no disagreement with the turn of events one way or another. But it’s interesting where the US is standing in relation to our condemnation of the Ottoman Empire’s actions.

The United States is a leader in a worldwide policy of oppression and mass murder. This campaign has killed more people than every single American war put together. Because of this policy, an average of 46 million people are killed worldwide, with over one million of those being in the US itself (as of 1996). This policy is marketed as part of the package of personal freedom and is called quite deceptively “the right to choose”. Everyone knows what I’m talking about, and by now I’ve already polarized my readers.

It’s obvious what side I’m on from the language I used above. In this entry, I’d like to present the reasons for my position. They are many.

First off, it is often asked, “Is the unborn fetus actually human?” This has a certain ring to it that’s similar to the question of whether or not Africans were human. This is extremely ironic, since those who identify themselves as “pro-choice” also tend to identify themselves with the civil rights movement. As for the actual question, even if there is no easy scientific way to decide, there is a common sense method of settling it. Say there is an old building that is being taken down via controlled demolition. The explosives team is all set and the countdown has already started. Then someone shouts out of nowhere that there is someone still in the building. Immediately, any sane person manning the procedure would cancel the countdown. If there’s any risk at all that the actions are going to kill a human being, no person in his right mind would just blast through anyway. Yet in the case of abortion the argument goes, “Well, we don’t really know sure, so we might as well do it anyway.”

There is also the argument that a fetus is really only an extension of the mother up until some point, and that the point where the child can live on his own, without her support, is the point where that person becomes a human individual. After using the same argument as my first, I must asked how this can be used as any sort of guideline, since scientists have for years been confident that some day we’ll be able to have “test tube” babies that are outside the biological womb from conception to “birth“. One must also take into consideration that a newborn child is unable to survive without parental care. The same goes for severe anemia patients and the frail elderly. If this argument were applied fairly, then involuntary euthanasia should enjoy the same acceptance as abortion.

The vast majority of abortions are carried out because having a child would be a “nuisance”, a “burden”, ect. Why is it then that so many people who are “pro-choice” are also pro-social security and pro-welfare? Why do they want government assistance? Is not someone who benefits from government aid leeching off of society and being a nuisance? Furthermore, if a child is a burden, then why is it all right to kill that child earlier and not later?

It is argued that abortion should be made available to rape victims. To me, this makes no sense. If a crime is committed where someone assaults, say, a street vendor, should the witness be put to death? In the case of abortion, it’s even more than that. Should one of the victims be put to death? Moreover, very very very few of total abortions are a result of this crime.

The very phrase “a woman’s right to choose” is so extremely arrogant and elitist. Why is the child not given a voice in the matter? It sounds very much like the old mentality that Africans were just property. It also ignores the fact that many of those children who are put to death are female. Did those women have the right to choose life?

There was a time when children were routinely sacrificed to various gods for various perceived reasons. In the Old Testament, there is mention of the detestable practice of burning children alive in sacrifice to Moloch. Today, we still have child sacrifices. It’s called abortion. It’s “necessary” in order to ensure women’s liberty. It is a tribute to the goddess of America, the Roman goddess Libertus, after whom the Statue of Liberty is modeled.

Why are so many people blind to the fact that abortion is a form of paganism and tyranny? Why are so many people blind to the fact that the woman’s true right to choose is the right to choose whether or not to go out with that guy? It’s because this is America. In America, liberty has a special meaning, a meaning that lies in the origin of the goddess Libertus. For those curious, check out the website aoreport.com. You’ll either be shocked or humored, but it’s up to you which one it’ll be.

This is only a small sample of the arguments that can be raised against abortion. For further reading see:

http://www.equip.org/site/c.muI1LaMNJrE/b.2706543/k.AE15/DA375.htm

http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html

http://creationwiki.org/Abortion

Also check out http://www.aoreport.com/mag/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=68&Itemid=47

Permalink